Using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to formulate a continuous improvement process (CIP)
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review
The growing importance of setting up continuous improvement strategies in manufacturing organisations is proving to be a difficult process. Managers seem to have difficulties in choosing strategies that will improve productivity, availability and quality. A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), is used as a means of systematising the decision process. A generic framework was developed to formulate an ideal strategy for a Continuous Improvement Process (CIP) using AHP. In addition, the issues and implications regarding consistency and sensitivity analysis are also discussed.
|Title of host publication||Proceedings of the 33rd international MATADOR conference|
|Editors||D. Hayhurst, S. Hinduja, J. Atkinson, M. Burdekin, R. Hannam, L. Li, Ashraf Labib|
|Place of Publication||Manchester|
|Number of pages||6|
|Publication status||Published - 2000|