Skip to content

Who said what and when? A timeline approach to eliciting information and intelligence about conversations, plots, and plans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

The verbal content of interactions (what was said and who said what) can be important as evidence and intelligence information. Across 3 empirical studies, we examined memory for details of an overheard (Experiment 1) or witnessed (Experiments 2 and 3) conversation using a timeline technique adapted for the reporting of conversations between multiple speakers. Although participants in all conditions received the same general instructions, participants assigned to timeline reporting format reported more verbatim information and made fewer sequencing errors than those using a free recall format. In Experiments 2 and 3, using an extended version of the technique, participants using the timeline reporting format also reported more correct speaker attributions and provided more information about the individuals involved, without compromising overall accuracy rates. With a large effect size across experiments (total N = 134), these findings suggest that timeline reporting formats facilitate the reporting of episodic memories and benefit the reporting of conversations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-277
Number of pages15
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Documents

  • Who said what and when

    Rights statement: © American Psychological Association, [2019]. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000329

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 377 KB, PDF document

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 13817943